One oil shock, four answers: the Fed holds, Canada hikes, New Zealand holds, Türkiye cuts
In the space of a week, four central banks set policy against the same backdrop of elevated energy prices tied to the conflict in the Middle East, and reached four different answers.
The US Federal Reserve held at 3.75% to 4% on 28 October, with two members voting for a hike, describing activity as strong and inflation as elevated (https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20261028a.htm). The Bank of Canada raised its rate to 2.5% the same day, saying CPI near 3% could rise to about 3.5% and that cost pass-through is set to increase, even though core inflation is close to 2% (https://www.bankofcanada.ca/2026/10/fad-press-release-2026-10-28/). The Reserve Bank of New Zealand held at 2.75% on a 4–3 vote, with inflation of 3.7% forecast to reach 4.4% in December on fuel, and said tighter policy is likely (https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/news-and-events/news/2026/10/ocr-held-at-2-75-percent). Türkiye's central bank cut from 37% to 36% on 22 October, citing a slowing underlying trend and weak demand while naming energy as an upside risk (https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/Announcements/Press+Releases/2026/ANO2026-45).
The shock is common; the starting points are not. The Fed's statement pairs elevated inflation with strong activity, so its debate runs between holding and tightening. Canada moved with core inflation near target, explicitly to stop energy costs spreading. New Zealand's committee agreed on the inflation outlook but split on timing. Türkiye is cutting from a very high level as its own disinflation continues.

What it means
The common thread is that no bank treated the oil shock as purely temporary: even the one that cut flagged it as a risk, and the two that held both signalled readiness to tighten. The split is about evidence of spillover into domestic prices, which each bank reads in its own data — and which the next round of inflation releases will test.